Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Regenerative capability is limited in higher vertebrates but present in organ systems such as skin, liver, bone, and to some extent, the nervous system. Peripheral nerves in particular have a relatively high potential for regeneration following injury. However, delay in regrowth or growth, blockage, or misdirection at the injury site, and growth to inappropriate end organs may compromise successful regeneration, leading to poor clinical results. Recent studies indicate that low‐intensity electrical stimulation is equivalent to various growth factors, offering avenues to improve these outcomes. We present a review of studies using electric and electromagnetic fields that provide evidence for the enhancement of regeneration following nerve injury. Electric and electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been used to heal fracture non‐unions. This technology emerged as a consequence of basic studies Yasuda, 1953; Fukada and Yasuda, 1957 demonstrating the piezoelectric properties of (dry) bone. The principle for using electrical stimulation for bone healing originated from the work of Bassett and Becker 1962, who described asymmetric voltage waveforms from mechanically deformed live bone. These changes were presumed to occur in bone during normal physical activity as a result of mechanical forces, and it was postulated that these forces were linked to modifications in bone structure. Endogenous currents present in normal tissue and those that occur after injury were proposed to modify bone structure Bassett, 1989. These investigators proposed that tissue integrity and function could be restored by applying electrical and/or mechanical energy to the area of injury. They successfully applied electrical currents to nonhealing fractures (using surgically implanted electrodes or pulsed currents using surface electrodes) to aid endogenous currents in the healing process. A considerable technological improvement was made with the noninvasive application of EMFs Bassett et al., 1974 to accelerate fracture repair. This newer technique allowed the treatment of hard tissues without the complications of invasive electrode insertion. In addition, soft tissue injuries were now accessible for treatment by electromagnetic fields. In this article, we will first define the basic problems encountered in nerve injury and regeneration, and then review both in vitro and in vivo studies on the use of electric and electromagnetic fields to stimulate the healing process.
Sisken et al. (Thu,) studied this question.