Categorizing heart failure patients by left ventricular systolic versus diastolic dysfunction provides a useful framework for guiding medical therapy and assessing prognosis.
Categorizing heart failure by left ventricular systolic versus diastolic dysfunction improves diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication compared to the descriptive term congestive heart failure.
Data from large and small clinical trials reflect major differences in the pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction. These studies also indicate that medical therapy can benefit patients with LV dysfunction regardless of whether or not they are symptomatic. Because the descriptive term congestive heart failure does not provide for these important distinctions, a new classification of LV dysfunction has been developed in which patients with LV dysfunction are categorized on the basis of normal or abnormal systolic function. This classification is based on a simple assessment of LV function, it is applicable to patients without symptoms, and it reflects differences in treatment and prognosis. Those with clinically significant LV systolic dysfunction (ie, an LV ejection fraction JAMA. 1994;271:1276-1280)
William H. Gaasch (Wed,) conducted a review in Heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Classification based on left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction was evaluated. Categorizing heart failure patients by left ventricular systolic versus diastolic dysfunction provides a useful framework for guiding medical therapy and assessing prognosis.