Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The Hydrologist's traditional tool for measuring rainfall is the rain gauge. Rain gauges are relatively cheap, easy to maintain and provide a direct and suitably accurate estimate of rainfall at a point. What rain gauges fail to capture well is the spatial variability of rainfall with time, an important aspect for the credible modelling of a catchment's response to rainfall. This spatial variability is particularly evident at short timescales of up to several days. As the period of accumulation increases, the expected spatial variability is reduced and rain gauges provide improved spatial rainfall estimates. Because of the fractal variability of rainfall in space, simple interpolation between rain gauges does not provide an accurate estimate of the true spatial rainfall field, at short time scales. Weather radar provides (with a single instrument) a highly detailed representation of the spatial structure and temporal evolution of rainfall over a large area. Estimated rainfall rates are derived indirectly from measurements of reflectivity and are therefore subject to a combination of systematic and random errors. This article describes a recently proposed merging technique and presents an application to simulated rainfall fields. The technique employed is Conditional Merging (Ehret, 2002 ), which makes use of Kriging to extract the optimal information content from the observed data. A mean field based on the Kriged rain gauge data is adopted, while the spatial detail from the radar is retained, reducing bias, but keeping the spatial variability observed by the radar. The variance of the estimate is reduced in the vicinity of the gauges where they are able to provide good information on the true rainfall field. Copyright © 2005 Royal Meteorological Society
Sinclair et al. (Sat,) studied this question.