A novel eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation velocity-selective preparation reduced eddy current effects compared to previous preparations, improving the reliability of perfusion measurements.
Does a novel eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation VS preparation improve robustness to eddy currents compared to previous preparations in healthy volunteers?
A novel eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation velocity-selective preparation reduces eddy current effects, improving the quality and reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements.
Velocity-selective (VS) arterial spin labeling is a promising method for measuring perfusion in areas of slow or collateral flow by eliminating the bolus arrival delay associated with other spin labeling techniques. However, B(0) and B(1) inhomogeneities and eddy currents during the VS preparation hinder accurate quantification of perfusion with VS arterial spin labeling. In this study, it is demonstrated through simulations and experiments in healthy volunteers that eddy currents cause erroneous tagging of static tissue. Consequently, mean gray matter perfusion is overestimated by up to a factor of 2, depending on the VS preparation used. A novel eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation VS preparation is proposed to reduce eddy current effects while maintaining the B(0) and B(1) insensitivity of previous preparations. Compared to two previous VS preparations, the eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation is the most robust to eddy currents and should improve the quality and reliability of VS arterial spin labeling measurements in future studies.
Meakin et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Healthy volunteers. Eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation velocity-selective preparation vs. Two previous velocity-selective preparations was evaluated on Robustness to eddy currents and perfusion quantification accuracy. A novel eight-segment B(1) insensitive rotation velocity-selective preparation reduced eddy current effects compared to previous preparations, improving the reliability of perfusion measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: