Ischemic preconditioning improved recovery of left ventricular developed pressure compared to control (72% vs 36%; P<0.001), an effect blocked by PI3-kinase inhibitors.
Ischemic preconditioning protects the heart via a signaling pathway where PI3-kinase acts upstream of protein kinase C and nitric oxide production.
Absolute Event Rate: 72% vs 36%
p-value: p=<0.001
The present study is designed to test whether phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) has a role in the signaling pathway in ischemic preconditioning (PC) and whether it is proximal or distal to protein kinase C (PKC). Before 20 minutes of global ischemia, Langendorff-perfused rat hearts were perfused for 20 minutes (control); preconditioned with 4 cycles of 5-minute ischemia and 5-minute reflow (PC); treated with either wortmannin (WM) or LY 294002 (LY), each of which is a PI3-kinase inhibitor, for 5 minutes before and throughout PC; treated with 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DOG), an activator of PKC for 10 minutes (DOG); treated identically to the DOG group except with WM added 10 minutes before and during perfusion with DOG; or treated with either WM or LY for 25 minutes. Recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP; percentage of initial preischemic LVDP), measured after 30 minutes of reflow, was improved by PC (72+/-2% versus 36+/-4% in control; P0.05 compared with DOG; P<0.05 compared with control). PC induced phosphorylation of protein kinase B and translocation of PKC epsilon, and it increased NO production, and these effects were blocked by WM, which suggests a role for PI3-kinase in PC upstream of PKC and NO.
Tong et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Ischemia. Ischemic preconditioning (PC) vs. Control (perfused for 20 minutes before ischemia) was evaluated on Recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP; percentage of initial preischemic LVDP) (p=<0.001). Ischemic preconditioning improved recovery of left ventricular developed pressure compared to control (72% vs 36%; P<0.001), an effect blocked by PI3-kinase inhibitors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: