Among 192,851 new users of oral anticoagulants with atrial fibrillation in 2015-2016, NOACs were initiated more frequently (66.3%) than VKAs, though inappropriate use and underdosing were common.
Observational (n=1,100,000)
Yes
What are the trends and patterns of oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation following the introduction of NOACs in France?
NOACs have become the preferred drug class for initiating oral anticoagulation in AF patients in France, though inappropriate prescribing such as underdosing and concomitant use of bleeding-risk drugs remains common.
OBJECTIVES: To describe (i) the trend in oral anticoagulant (OAC) use following the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and (ii) the current patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF in France. DESIGN: (i) Repeated cross-sectional study and (ii) population-based cohort study. SETTING: French national healthcare databases (50 million beneficiaries). PARTICIPANTS: (i) Patients with identified AF in 2011, 2013 and 2016 and (ii) patients with AF initiating OAC therapy in 2015-2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (i) Trend in OAC therapy use in patients with AF and (ii) patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, use of OAC therapy moderately increased (+16%), while use of antiplatelet therapy decreased (-22%) among all patients with identified AF. In 2016, among the 1.1 million AF patients, 66% used OAC therapy and were more likely to be treated by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) than NOAC therapy, including patients at higher risk of stroke (63.5%), while 33% used antiplatelet therapy. Among 192 851 new users of OAC therapy in 2015-2016 with identified AF, NOAC therapy (66.3%) was initiated more frequently than VKA therapy, including in patients at higher risk of stroke (57.8%). Reduced doses were prescribed in 40% of NOAC new users. Several situations of inappropriate use at NOAC initiation were identified, including concomitant use of drugs increasing the risk of bleeding (one in three new users) and potential NOAC underdosing. CONCLUSIONS: OAC therapy use in patients with AF remains suboptimal 4 years after the introduction of NOACs for stroke prevention in France and improvement in appropriate prescribing regarding NOAC initiation is needed. However, NOAC therapy is now the preferred drug class for initiation of OAC therapy in patients with AF, including in patients at higher risk of stroke.
Maura et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in atrial fibrillation (n=1,100,000). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Trend in OAC therapy use in patients with AF and patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF. Among 192,851 new users of oral anticoagulants with atrial fibrillation in 2015-2016, NOACs were initiated more frequently (66.3%) than VKAs, though inappropriate use and underdosing were common.