This paper explores democratic innovations in Ukraine, examining their development from the year of Ukraine's declaration of independence to the present day. Amidst a global "democratic malaise," democratic innovations – including referendum, participatory budgeting, electronic petitions, Citizens’ Assemblies, and the "Diia" e-government ecosystem – serve as correctives to representative gaps. As democratic innovations were designed to bridge the gap between citizens and the state, in the situation where elections are not held due to military situation, these innovations are crucial. The study uses online focus group method conducted with civil society representatives in June 2025 to identify systemic barriers and develop strategies for enhancing their effectiveness. Findings reveal that while Ukraine demonstrates significant "digital resilience," the implementation of these tools faces multifaceted challenges. These include socio-psychological barriers such as "small person syndrome" and Soviet-era paternalism, educational gaps in civic awareness, and institutional limitations like imperfect regulatory framework. Furthermore, the war has introduced infrastructural damage, alongside complex migration dynamics that threaten community cohesion. According to the results of our research, dissatisfaction with the government's performance acts as a motivator for engagement, as citizens use participatory tools to show the authorities how things should be done if they have already been done in a wrong way. The paper concludes by offering strategic recommendations to bridge the gap between participation and tangible results. These include tying innovations to everyday local issues, implementing hybrid online-offline communication models to ensure inclusion, and fostering a "shared language of cooperation" through the education of both youth and civil servants.
Irina Kuzina (Mon,) studied this question.