High tumor grade (G3 vs. G1-2) independently predicted worse overall survival (HR 4.40; 95% CI 1.56-12.41; p=0.01) in patients undergoing resection of primary thoracic sarcomas.
Cohort (n=84)
What are the prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival in patients undergoing resection of primary thoracic soft tissue and bone sarcomas?
Histological grade, tumor size, and incomplete resection are strong independent predictors of survival in patients undergoing resection for thoracic sarcomas.
Hazard Ratio: 4.4 (95% CI 1.56–12.41)
p-value: p=0.01
Objectives: Thoracic sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing resection of primary thoracic soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with primary intrathoracic or chest wall sarcomas who underwent surgical resection between 2005 and 2020. Eighty-four patients were included: 60 with soft tissue sarcoma and 24 with bone sarcoma. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Results: The most common histological subtypes were chondrosarcoma (19%) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (17.8%). Overall, 54.8% of patients were female, and the mean age was 55.7 years (SD 17.9). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies were primarily administered in intermediate- (G2) and high-grade (G3) tumors. Median OS was 28.4 months. On multivariate analysis, high tumor grade (G3 vs. G1–2) independently predicted worse PFS (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.34–7.68; p = 0.01) and OS (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.56–12.41; p = 0.01). Larger tumor size (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.15; p = 0.001) and incomplete resection (HR 12.21, 95% CI 2.56–58.34; p = 0.002) were independently associated with worse OS, while lung metastases at diagnosis independently predicted worse PFS (HR 4.89, 95% CI 1.21–19.69; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Histological grade is the strongest independent predictor of survival in resected thoracic sarcoma. Surgery alone appears adequate for low-grade sarcomas, whereas multimodal treatment strategies seem particularly relevant for patients with higher-grade sarcomas.
Yavuz et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Primary thoracic soft tissue and bone sarcomas (n=84). High tumor grade (G3) vs. Low/intermediate tumor grade (G1-2) was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.56-12.41, p=0.01). High tumor grade (G3 vs. G1-2) independently predicted worse overall survival (HR 4.40; 95% CI 1.56-12.41; p=0.01) in patients undergoing resection of primary thoracic sarcomas.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: