Abstract To ensure an effective and efficient engagement, audit planning of the nature, extent, and timing of procedures is crucial. This paper provides a review of the professional standards and research findings on evidential planning. The professional standards provide useful evidential concepts and advance several presumptions or "rules-of-thumb" to guide auditors. Early research findings, however, suggest that several widely used procedures may possess low error detection capabilities. Given the embryonic state of our knowledge on evidential quality, a "Contingency View" of evidence is outlined. In this view the cost-effectiveness of a source of evidence is dependent upon factors such as the nature of the client, the account, and the method of obtaining the evidence.
Wright et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: