Higher levels of computed tomography-assessed aortic valve calcium were associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure (HR 1.10 per one-unit increase in log(AVC+1); 95% CI 1.03-1.18).
Cohort (n=2,348)
Is computed tomography-assessed aortic valve calcium associated with subclinical cardiac dysfunction and incident heart failure in the general population?
Higher levels of computed tomography-assessed aortic valve calcium are independently associated with subclinical cardiac dysfunction and an increased risk of incident heart failure.
Hazard Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 1.03–1.18)
BACKGROUND: The link between (mild) aortic valve calcium (AVC) with subclinical cardiac dysfunction and with risk of heart failure (HF) remains unclear. This research aims to determine the association of computed tomography-assessed AVC with echocardiographic measurements of cardiac dysfunction, and with HF in the general population. METHODS: We included 2348 participants of the Rotterdam Study cohort (mean age 68.5 years, 52% women), who had AVC measurement between 2003 and 2006, and without history of HF at baseline. Linear regression models were used to explore relationship between AVC and echocardiographic measures at baseline. Participants were followed until December 2016. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to assess the association of AVC with incident HF, accounting for death as a competing risk. RESULTS: The presence of AVC or greater AVC were associated with larger mean left ventricular mass and larger mean left atrial size. In particular, AVC ≥800 showed a strong association (body surface area indexed left ventricular mass, β coefficient: 22.01; left atrium diameter, β coefficient: 0.17). During a median of 9.8 years follow-up, 182 incident HF cases were identified. After accounting for death events and adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, one-unit larger log (AVC+1) was associated with a 10% increase in the subdistribution hazard of HF (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.10 95% CI, 1.03-1.18), but the presence of AVC was not significantly associated with HF risk in fully adjusted models. Compared with the AVC=0, AVC between 300 and 799 (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.36 95% CI, 1.32-4.19) and AVC ≥800 (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.54 95% CI, 1.31-4.90) were associated with a high risk of HF. CONCLUSIONS: Presence and high levels of AVC were associated with markers of left ventricular structure, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Larger computed tomography-assessed AVC is an indicative of increased risk for the development of HF.
Zhu et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in General population without history of heart failure (n=2,348). Aortic valve calcium (AVC) vs. AVC=0 was evaluated on Incident heart failure (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.18). Higher levels of computed tomography-assessed aortic valve calcium were associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure (HR 1.10 per one-unit increase in log(AVC+1); 95% CI 1.03-1.18).