This OSF project archives a project edition of “Rebuttal-Centric Peer Review in the Era of LLM-Accelerated Submissions: A Practitioner’s Proposal for Scalable Evaluation.” The manuscript proposes a rebuttal-centric framework for scalable peer review under conditions of LLM-accelerated submission growth. It argues that peer review failures should be treated not merely as reviewer-level errors, but as institutional responsibility-allocation problems. This project is intended for public access, version fixation, citation, and future scholarly development. The document has not been formally peer reviewed.
Nishikimi Naoki (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: