In February 2025, many datasets were removed from United States federal government websites. This alarming development led library staff at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) to worry that federally funded articles and research outputs might follow. To preserve UNC-CH authored research in service of UNC-CH's Open Access Policy, librarians rapidly developed and deployed the Federal Repository Harvesting Project. For this project, we identified UNC-CH authored research held in multiple federal repositories, harvested metadata and available PDFs, and uploaded the outputs to our Hyrax-based institutional repository. In this presentation, I will describe the project, including our repository identification criteria, our methods of harvesting eligible content, and the ingest process. I will reflect on the lessons that our team learned as we deployed a project rapidly to address a continually changing issue. Finally, I will address the changes that we have made to our repository collection strategy to convert the project from a one-off to an ongoing process.
Rebekah Kati (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: