Accurate transfer of implant position is essential for implant-supported prosthodontic workflows. This in vitro study compared the trueness and precision of five intraoral scanners in single crown, three-unit fixed partial denture, and full-arch implant-supported scanning scenarios using root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis. Two maxillary resin models, representing partially dentulous and fully edentulous conditions, were fabricated through a CAD/CAM and 3D-printing workflow with implant analogs and scan bodies. Reference datasets were obtained with an InEos X5 desktop scanner, and each intraoral scanner was used to perform 10 scans per scenario. After standardized scenario-specific trimming, datasets were analyzed in Geomagic Control X. Statistical analysis included two-way analysis of variance and follow-up one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni-adjusted thresholds. Trueness was affected by scanner type (p < 0.001) and scenario (p < 0.001), without interaction (p = 0.096). Precision was affected by scanner type (p = 0.012), scenario (p = 0.004), and their interaction (p < 0.001). iTero Lumina and Helios 600 showed lower trueness deviations, whereas Trios 5 showed greater deviations, especially in full-arch scans. Scanner selection and scan extent should therefore be considered when interpreting surface-based RMS accuracy in implant-supported digital scans.
Nosser et al. (Wed,) studied this question.