This study investigates the aerodynamic performance of a two-building ensemble as an integrated architectural–aerodynamic system, with a focus on airflow conditions relevant to building-integrated wind turbines. The research addresses the question of whether newly designed development can actively improve, rather than deteriorate, airflow conditions above existing buildings. A parametric CFD analysis based on steady-state RANS (SST k–ω) simulations was conducted for multiple geometric configurations of a reference building (A) and a neighboring building (B), varying roof pitch (22–40°) and height. Airflow was evaluated using mean longitudinal velocity (Vy), coefficient of variation (CV), and vector components across three architectural scenarios corresponding to different turbine-integration strategies. The results demonstrate that properly designed geometries can significantly enhance flow quality. In the near-roof scenario (Arch1), the optimal configuration achieved a 24.28% increase in Vy and a 94.53% reduction in CV, indicating strong flow stabilization. In the façade-integration scenario (Arch2), improvements reached +10.40% in Vy and −23.16% in CV, reflecting vertical homogenization of the flow field. In the point-based scenario (Arch3), a local velocity increase of 4.29% was obtained while maintaining directional stability. The findings indicate that building geometry acts as an active design parameter that controls flow intensity, homogeneity, and direction. The study proposes a CFD-based decision framework and demonstrates that architectural form can be deliberately shaped to enhance wind conditions, supporting the integration of wind turbines into coherent building design.
Obuchowicz et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: