Intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy increased recanalization (96.7% vs 64.1%, P<0.001), whereas intraarterial tirofiban increased symptomatic hemorrhage (19.1% vs 0%, P<0.001).
Cohort (n=503)
Does intravenous or intraarterial tirofiban improve outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Intravenous tirofiban as an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy improves recanalization and clinical outcomes, while intraarterial tirofiban increases the risk of hemorrhage and death.
Absolute Event Rate: 96.7% vs 64.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Background and Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who received endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no tirofiban (n=354), intraarterial tirofiban (n=79), and intravenous tirofiban (n=70). The 3 groups were compared in terms of recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital death rate, 3-month death, and 3-month outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale score (good clinical outcome of 0–2, poor outcome of 5–6). The comparison was statistically assessed by propensity score matching, followed by Freidman rank-sum test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Results: The propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched triplets. Compared with the no-tirofiban group, the intravenous tirofiban group showed significantly increased recanalization (96.7% versus 64.1%, P <0.001), an increased rate of 3-month good outcome (69.5% versus 51.2%, P =0.034), and a lower rate of 3-month poor outcome (12.2% versus 41.4%, P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the tirofiban intravenous and no-tirofiban groups in terms of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (2.2% versus 0%, P =1.000). However, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly increased in the intraarterial-tirofiban group compared with the no-tirofiban group (19.1% versus 0%, P <0.001), with an increased rate of in-hospital death (23.6% versus 0% P <0.001), and increased rate of 3-month death (26.8% versus 11.1%, P =0.021). The intraarterial-tirofiban and no-tirofiban group showed no significant difference in recanalization rate (66.3% versus 64.1%, P =1.000). Conclusions: As an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy, intravenous tirofiban is associated with high recanalization rate and good outcome, whereas intraarterial tirofiban is associated with high hemorrhagic rate and death rate.
Yang et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=503). Intravenous or intraarterial tirofiban vs. No tirofiban was evaluated on Recanalization rate (p=<0.001). Intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy increased recanalization (96.7% vs 64.1%, P<0.001), whereas intraarterial tirofiban increased symptomatic hemorrhage (19.1% vs 0%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: