Deep ‘room and pillar’ (R&P) mining without subsequent depillaring offers a low-impact alternative for extracting coal beneath sensitive surface infrastructure, yet the geomechanical behaviour of such operations at depths approaching 900 m remains poorly understood because seismicity and subsidence research have evolved largely independently. Key scientific and engineering contributions are represented by coupled analysis of induced microseismicity and surface deformation during a deep R&P trial in the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, where high-grade coal was extracted from a shaft protection pillar at depths of 700 to 900 m. A dual-scale monitoring architecture, combining regional seismological networks with local seismoacoustic sensors and precise surface levelling over six years, captured the mechanical response with metre-scale spatial resolution and millimetre-scale vertical accuracy. The study identifies two distinct anomalous seismic regimes: stress redistribution during roadway approaches to existing workings, which intensifies at face-to-roadway distances of 13 to 16 m, and wide-area activation of reverse tectonic faults triggered by incremental excavation. Pillar compression emerged as the dominant deformation mechanism, generating low-energy seismic events and limiting maximum surface subsidence to 17 mm, a value validated through Knothe influence function calculations driven by measured roof convergence. These results establish the first empirical seismicity-subsidence dataset for non-retreat deep R&P mining, provide a replicable monitoring protocol for similar depth regimes, and demonstrate that this extraction geometry can substantially mitigate surface impact relative to longwall alternatives.
Koníček et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: