Catheter-based reperfusion strategies for intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism show short-term haemodynamic improvements, but lack robust evidence for mortality or long-term functional benefits.
Do catheter-based reperfusion strategies improve clinical outcomes in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism?
Catheter-based reperfusion for intermediate-high-risk PE improves short-term haemodynamics, but lacks robust evidence for long-term clinical benefits, highlighting the need for better patient selection and high-quality trials.
Intermediate-high-risk (IHR) pulmonary embolism (PE) remains one of the most challenging clinical phenotypes in contemporary PE management. Although haemodynamically stable at presentation, these patients remain at significant risk of clinical deterioration, right ventricular failure, and haemodynamic decompensation. Current management primarily relies on anticoagulation and close surveillance, while routine reperfusion therapy remains controversial due to the balance between potential haemodynamic benefit and bleeding risk. Catheter-based reperfusion strategies, including catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, have emerged as potential alternatives to systemic thrombolysis in selected patients. However, despite growing procedural adoption, important uncertainties remain regarding optimal patient selection, timing of intervention, and comparative effectiveness. Current evidence demonstrates consistent short-term improvements in surrogate haemodynamic parameters, but robust evidence for reductions in mortality, recurrent PE, chronic thromboembolic complications, or long-term functional impairment remains limited. This narrative review critically evaluates contemporary catheter-based reperfusion strategies in IHR PE, focusing on methodological limitations of the current evidence base and unresolved challenges in clinical decision-making. It highlights the limitations of existing risk stratification models and the heterogeneity of IHR PE, where static risk categories often fail to capture dynamic clinical deterioration. Future progress in this field will likely depend on improved patient selection, refined risk assessment, and personalised reperfusion strategies supported by high-quality comparative trials.
Paszenda et al. (Sun,) conducted a review in Intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism. Catheter-based reperfusion strategies was evaluated. Catheter-based reperfusion strategies for intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism show short-term haemodynamic improvements, but lack robust evidence for mortality or long-term functional benefits.