A once-daily polypill significantly improved ejection fraction compared to enhanced usual care in patients with heart failure (mean difference 3.3 percentage points; 95% CI 0.2-6.4; P=0.039).
RCT (n=212)
open-label
randomized
Yes
Does a once-daily polypill containing metoprolol, spironolactone, and empagliflozin improve ejection fraction in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to enhanced usual care?
A polypill strategy for HFrEF significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction and medication adherence while reducing heart failure events compared to standard rapid uptitration.
Mean Difference: 3.3 (95% CI 0.2–6.4)
p-value: p=0.039
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction carries a poor prognosis. Although guideline-directed medical therapy reduces morbidity and mortality, its real-world utilization is low. Accordingly, we conducted an open-label randomized trial (POLY-HF) at two centers enrolling a predominantly underserved population to test whether a polypill strategy improves cardiac function in heart failure. Adults with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were randomized to a once-daily polypill containing metoprolol succinate (25/50/100/150 mg), spironolactone 12.5 mg and empagliflozin 10 mg, or rapid uptitration of individual guideline-directed medical therapy medications (‘enhanced usual care’). Participants also continued treatment with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor or sacubitril/valsartan as a separate pill. The primary endpoint was ejection fraction as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes and adherence. We randomized 212 patients (median age 54 years, 22% female, 54% Black). Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging data were available for 187 (88%) participants who were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Polypill treatment was associated with greater improvement in ejection fraction compared to enhanced usual care (between-group difference, 3.3 percentage points, 95% confidence interval, 0.2–6.4; P = 0.039), meeting the primary outcome. Individuals randomized to the polypill also had a 60% lower rate of heart failure hospitalizations or emergency department visits (adjusted rate ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.88; P = 0.024). Adherence, assessed by blood concentrations of metoprolol and spironolactone, was higher with polypill treatment than with enhanced usual care (79% versus 54%, P = 0.001). The polypill was well tolerated, with fewer adverse events with polypill treatment as compared to enhanced usual care. A polypill for heart failure was associated with a significant improvement in cardiac function as compared with enhanced usual care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04633005 .
“These data support that simplifying medication regimens through a polypill approach can substantially improve both clinical and patient-centered outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Future trials are needed to evaluate long-term effects on mortality and morbidity and assess implementation strategies to inform the adoption of polypills for management of heart failure in diverse healthcare settings.”
Media coverage in Newswise, News-Medical; discussed for practice change in HFrEF management.
Pandey et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=212). polypill vs. rapid uptitration of individual guideline-directed medical therapy medications (enhanced usual care) was evaluated on ejection fraction as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months (MD 3.3 percentage points, 95% CI 0.2-6.4, p=0.039). A once-daily polypill significantly improved ejection fraction compared to enhanced usual care in patients with heart failure (mean difference 3.3 percentage points; 95% CI 0.2-6.4; P=0.039).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: