Renal congestion in heart failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, highlighting an unmet need for novel diagnostic markers and evidence-based therapeutic management.
This review highlights the prognostic importance of renal congestion in heart failure and the unmet need for effective diagnostic markers and decongestion strategies.
Hospitalizations due to heart failure are increasing steadily despite advances in medicine. Patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure have high mortality in hospital and within the months following discharge. Kidney dysfunction is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure patients. Recent evidence suggests that both deterioration in kidney function and renal congestion are important prognostic factors in heart failure. Kidney congestion in heart failure results from low cardiac output (forward failure), tubuloglomerular feedback, increased intra-abdominal pressure or increased venous pressure. Regardless of the cause, renal congestion is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure. The impact on outcomes of renal decongestion strategies that do not compromise renal function should be explored in heart failure. These studies require novel diagnostic markers that identify early renal damage and renal congestion and allow monitoring of treatment responses in order to avoid severe worsening of renal function. In addition, there is an unmet need regarding evidence-based therapeutic management of renal congestion and worsening renal function. In the present review, we summarize the mechanisms, diagnosis, outcomes, prognostic markers and treatment options of renal congestion in heart failure.
Afşar et al. (Sun,) conducted a review in Heart failure. Renal congestion was evaluated. Renal congestion in heart failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, highlighting an unmet need for novel diagnostic markers and evidence-based therapeutic management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: