What question did this study set out to answer?

The research examines the necessity of verifiable cryptographic signing for AI outputs in critical applications.

July 5, 2026Open Access

Cryptographic Provenance for AI Outputs

Key Points

The research examines the necessity of verifiable cryptographic signing for AI outputs in critical applications.
Introduced the Open Audit Record for signing AI actions.
Implemented post-quantum signing for enhanced security.
Filed 104 patent applications related to the Mickai system.
Showed the importance of cryptographic provenance in maintaining trust in AI outputs.
Demonstrated that Mickai's method is offline verifiable and secure.
Highlighted the ability to prove the integrity of AI actions.

Abstract

In high stakes environments, an AI answer is not enough. We explain why AI outputs need verifiable, cryptographically signed provenance, and how Mickai builds that proof into every action through the Open Audit Record and post-quantum signing.Originally published at https://mickai.co.uk/articles/cryptographic-provenance-for-ai-outputs. Mickai is a Sovereign Intelligence Operating System; the Open Audit Record signs every artificial intelligence action before it executes, post-quantum and offline-verifiable. 104 filed UK patent applications, Mickai LTD (Companies House 17166618).

Read Full Paperexternally

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Micky Irons (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a49f648f5d1d45b28800cb3 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21164617

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper