Abstract. Reducing methane (CH4) emissions has become increasingly important in recent years due to its importance for radiative forcing. Fugitive emissions of CH4 from natural gas distribution infrastructure are of particular interest as a mitigation target within the oil and gas sector. Previous studies have shown the ability to detect these emissions by use of mobile surveys measuring CH4, with some studies using ratios to secondary co-emitted compounds as a means of predicting the source of emission. This study aims to adapt existing algorithm parameters by investigating the limitations of equipment within the platform used for mobile surveys. These changes suggest that previous methods may underpredict the number of Leak Indications (LIs) by 53.5 % with 27 LIs detected with the old methodology compared to 58 LIs detected with the new methodology. The majority of these LIs were found to be emitting in a leak rate category of 0–2 L min−1. Source determination was included as a core step within the algorithm, which was shown to reduce the misassignment of LIs, suggesting when not using this step, emissions from pyrogenics and biogenics are included within LI assignments.
Moore et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: