Many metaphysical and scientific frameworks presuppose actuality as a given: a domain of determinate states, a background temporal order, or a fully actualised world in which events occur. While such assumptions enable explanation, they leave unexamined a more fundamental question: what must be the case for anything to count as actual at all. This paper develops a minimal, conditional ontology that targets this structural gap. Starting from the single assumption that difference is necessary for anything to appear or have effect, the framework articulates the least organisation required for local actuality to be intelligible without presupposing time, a global observer, or a globally actualised domain. It introduces a small set of structural distinctions—tension as organised unresolved possibility, tendency as the boundary-relative non-equivalence required for difference to register at all, loci of sensitivity as boundary-forms of registration, and fixation as the fact that a contrast can be closed relative to a boundary at all. These notions are not proposed as entities, mechanisms, or processes, but as structural necessary conditions implicit in taking difference as fundamental. Taking difference as fundamental it becomes clear that actuality is intrinsically local and boundary-relative; temporal order is not primitive but identifiable with the ordering of closed differences; and shared reality arises through partial structural alignment rather than global closure. The framework does not compete with scientific or metaphysical theories at the level of explanation. Instead, it specifies the minimal structural conditions under which anything can count as actual at all. Rejecting these conditions amounts not to adopting an alternative account, but to abandoning the intelligibility of actuality itself.
Kasper Nova (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: