Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Automated classification of Arabic legal texts presents unique challenges stemming from the formal register of judicial language, domain-specific Sharī‘a terminology, and the severe class imbalance inherent in hierarchical legal taxonomies. This paper addresses these challenges through a systematic investigation of hierarchical multi-class classification applied to a dataset of 1146 Arabic judicial cases sourced from the Saudi Ministry of Justice open data portal. Cases are annotated at two hierarchical levels: a binary main-class distinction between criminal and civil cases (L1), and a fine-grained sub-category classification across 63 legal topics (L2), exhibiting a class imbalance ratio of 43:1. We evaluate three methodological families under four classification architectures. For encoder-only models, we fine-tune AraBERT, CAMeL-BERT, MARBERTv2, and XLM-RoBERTa under Flat (Bottom-Up), Hierarchical Multi-Task, Two-Stage, and Hierarchy-Aware configurations. For encoder–decoder models, we adapt AraT5v2 under the same four architectures. Finally, we conduct a prompt-based evaluation of GPT-4o under zero-shot and targeted few-shot settings. The experimental results demonstrate that the Hierarchy-Aware architecture consistently achieves the strongest fine-grained classification performance across both model families. AraBERTv2 with Hierarchy-Aware training achieves the best overall L2 accuracy of 83.04% and a Macro-F1 of 76.07%, while the Single Multi-Task configuration achieves the highest L1 accuracy of 99.57%. GPT-4o under 5-shot prompting achieves 99.13% L1 accuracy and a competitive L2 Macro-F1 of 74.30% without task-specific fine-tuning, though supervised models maintain stronger overall fine-grained performance. These findings highlight the importance of explicit hierarchical supervision and domain-adapted pre-training for Arabic legal text classification, and establish strong baselines for future research in this underexplored domain.
Alangari et al. (Wed,) studied this question.