Exposure to low wall shear stress, defined by vessel-specific tertiles, significantly predicted coronary plaque progression (OR 1.6) compared to mid and high wall shear stress.
Observational (n=40)
No
Absolute thresholds for low wall shear stress are inadequate for predicting individual patient plaque progression due to wide inter-individual variation in absolute WSS values.
Odds Ratio: 1.6 (95% CI 1.3–2.1)
p-value: p=<0.05
Wall shear stress (WSS), the frictional force of the blood on the vessel wall, plays a crucial role in atherosclerotic plaque development. Low WSS has been associated with plaque growth, however previous research used different approaches to define low WSS to investigate its effect on plaque progression. In this study, we used four methodologies to allocate low, mid and high WSS in one dataset of human coronary arteries and investigated the predictive power of low WSS for plaque progression. Coronary reconstructions were based on multimodality imaging, using intravascular ultrasound and CT-imaging. Vessel-specific flow was measured using Doppler wire and computational fluid dynamics was performed to calculate WSS. The absolute WSS range varied greatly between the coronary arteries. On the population level, the established pattern of most plaque progression at low WSS was apparent in all methodologies defining the WSS categories. However, for the individual patient, when using measured flow to determine WSS, the absolute WSS values range so widely, that the use of absolute thresholds to determine low WSS was not appropriate to identify regions at high risk for plaque progression.
Hartman et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=40). Low wall shear stress vs. Mid and high wall shear stress was evaluated on Plaque growth (>15% plaque burden change) (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.1, p=<0.05). Exposure to low wall shear stress, defined by vessel-specific tertiles, significantly predicted coronary plaque progression (OR 1.6) compared to mid and high wall shear stress.