Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIM: To explore the influence of patient-provider communication on patient self-management of chronic illness. DESIGN: Systematic Mixed Studies Review. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Google Scholar, EMBASE and PubMed were searched until March 2024. METHODS: Employed a result-based convergent design and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool to evaluate studies. Narrative analysis, quantitative studies and thematic analysis for qualitative studies and overall results. RESULTS: Thirteen articles published between 2003 and 2023 were included. Chronic illnesses studied: diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Data synthesis yielded the overarching theme: adaptive interpersonal communication. An approach that adapts communication content to each patient's unique needs, employs verbal and nonverbal communication, builds a connection and establishes patient rapport. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that patient-provider communication influences chronic illness self-management. A provider's ability to adjust and tailor their communication style is an important factor in helping patients to achieve optimal self-management. Future research should explore this phenomenon in other common chronic illnesses not included in this review. Additionally, research on the patient's role in this process could help improve patient-provider communication. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Findings from this review have significant implications for shared and participatory decision making, where patients and providers collaborate to develop plans of care for patients to achieve optimal self-management. Additionally, this review can contribute to the development of educational content and communication strategies for nurses and all healthcare professionals caring for patients with chronic illnesses. IMPACT: This is the first mixed studies systematic review to describe the influence patient-provider communication on patient self-management of chronic illness. These findings consolidate existing evidence, providing a pathway for practical application to clinical practice and the potential to significantly impact the delivery of patient-centred care and healthcare quality. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Iroegbu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.