An algorithm using heart sounds and ECG estimated pre-ejection period and left ventricular ejection time with absolute errors of 7.66-11.86 ms and 11.39-17.51 ms compared to echocardiography.
Cross-Sectional
Can an algorithm using heart sounds and ECG accurately measure systolic time intervals compared to echocardiography in healthy and CVD subjects?
Heart sounds combined with ECG can be used to accurately estimate systolic time intervals (PEP and LVET) compared to echocardiography.
Systolic time intervals are highly correlated to fundamental cardiac functions. Several studies have shown that these measurements have significant diagnostic and prognostic value in heart failure condition and are adequate for long-term patient follow-up and disease management. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using heart sound (HS) to accurately measure the opening and closing moments of the aortic heart valve. These moments are crucial to define the main systolic timings of the heart cycle, i.e. pre-ejection period (PEP) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET). We introduce an algorithm for automatic extraction of PEP and LVET using HS and electrocardiogram. PEP is estimated with a Bayesian approach using the signal's instantaneous amplitude and patient-specific time intervals between atrio-ventricular valve closure and aortic valve opening. As for LVET, since the aortic valve closure corresponds to the start of the S2 HS component, we base LVET estimation on the detection of the S2 onset. A comparative assessment of the main systolic time intervals is performed using synchronous signal acquisitions of the current gold standard in cardiac time-interval measurement, i.e. echocardiography, and HS. The algorithms were evaluated on a healthy population, as well as on a group of subjects with different cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In the healthy group, from a set of 942 heartbeats, the proposed algorithm achieved 7.66 ± 5.92 ms absolute PEP estimation error. For LVET, the absolute estimation error was 11.39 ± 8.98 ms. For the CVD population, 404 beats were used, leading to 11.86 ± 8.30 and 17.51 ± 17.21 ms absolute PEP and LVET errors, respectively. The results achieved in this study suggest that HS can be used to accurately estimate LVET and PEP.
Paiva et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular diseases. Heart sound and ECG-based algorithm vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Absolute estimation error of pre-ejection period (PEP) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET). An algorithm using heart sounds and ECG estimated pre-ejection period and left ventricular ejection time with absolute errors of 7.66-11.86 ms and 11.39-17.51 ms compared to echocardiography.