Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect resulted in significantly less chronotropic impairment than surgical closure, with maximal heart rate <-2 SD in 0% vs 44.4% of patients.
Cohort (n=38)
No
Does transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect prevent chronotropic impairment compared to surgical closure in pediatric patients?
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect is associated with significantly less chronotropic impairment during exercise compared to surgical closure in pediatric patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 44.4%
BACKGROUND: In previous studies, an attenuated heart rate response to exercise has been noted in patients after surgical closure of atrial septal defect. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of chronotropic impairment after surgical and percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect. METHODS: Thirty-eight pediatric patients who underwent a surgical (group A, n = 18) or transcatheter closure (group B, n = 20) of atrial septal defect in our institution were prospectively included in the study. Treadmill exercise testing was performed using the Bruce walking treadmill protocol to voluntary exhaustion, with continuous monitoring of heart rate and oxygen consumption. RESULTS: All the children were in sinus rhythm, and had normal values for peak oxygen uptake and endurance time. Exercise heart rate was significantly lower than normal in group A at the end of stage 2 (Z-score = -0.71 +/- SD 1.02), and in both groups at the end of stage 3 (Z-score = -2.06 +/- 1.76 in A and -1.00 +/- 0.71 in B) and at peak exercise (Z-score = -2.78 +/- 2.14 in A and -0.81 +/- 0.75 in B). However, the heart rate response to exercise was significantly less attenuated in group B than in group A. Moreover, maximal heart rate was <-2 SD in 8/18 surgical patients but in no patient of the group B. CONCLUSION: The chronotropic impairment is significantly less important after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect than after surgical closure. It is an additional argument in favor of the interventional catheterization.
Massin et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Atrial septal defect (n=38). Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect vs. Surgical closure of atrial septal defect was evaluated on Maximal heart rate <-2 SD during exercise testing. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect resulted in significantly less chronotropic impairment than surgical closure, with maximal heart rate <-2 SD in 0% vs 44.4% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: