COVID-19 control measures significantly reduced the transmission of hand, foot, and mouth disease, with the relative difference in total attack rate ranging from 36.35% to 98.41% compared to the median of previous years in five of six cities.
Observational
Yes
Do COVID-19 preventive and control measures reduce the transmission of hand, foot, and mouth disease in mainland China?
COVID-19 preventive and control measures significantly contributed to the containment of hand, foot, and mouth disease transmission in China.
Effect estimate: RD 36.35-98.41%
Control measures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak may have limited the spread of infectious diseases. This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the spread of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) in China. A mathematical model was established to fit the reported data of HFMD in six selected cities in mainland China from 2015 to 2020. The absolute difference (AD) and relative difference (RD) between the reported incidence in 2020, and simulated maximum, minimum, or median incidence of HFMD in 2015–2019 were calculated. The incidence and Reff of HFMD have decreased in six selected cities since the outbreak of COVID-19, and in the second half of 2020, the incidence and Reff of HFMD have rebounded. The results show that the total attack rate (TAR) in 2020 was lower than the maximum, minimum, and median TAR fitted in previous years in six selected cities (except Changsha City). For the maximum, median, minimum fitted TAR, the range of RD (%) is 42·20–99·20%, 36·35–98·41% 48·35–96·23% (except Changsha City) respectively. The preventive and control measures of COVID-19 have significantly contributed to the containment of HFMD transmission.
Niu et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). COVID-19 control measures vs. Historical incidence (2015-2019) was evaluated on Total attack rate (TAR) of HFMD (RD 36.35-98.41%). COVID-19 control measures significantly reduced the transmission of hand, foot, and mouth disease, with the relative difference in total attack rate ranging from 36.35% to 98.41% compared to the median of previous years in five of six cities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: