Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells show therapeutic potential for myocardial infarction via differentiation and angiogenesis, though poor viability of transplanted cells remains a challenge.
Does bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation improve cardiac repair and function in myocardial infarction?
BMSCs show therapeutic potential for myocardial infarction repair through multiple mechanisms, but poor survival of transplanted cells and a lack of human clinical trials remain major hurdles.
Myocardial infarction (MI) results in dysfunction and irreversible loss of cardiomyocytes and is among the most serious health threats today. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), with their capacity for multidirectional differentiation, low immunogenicity, and high portability, can serve as ideal seed cells in cardiovascular disease therapy. In this review, we examine recent literature concerning the application of BMSCs for the treatment of MI and consider the following aspects: activity of transplanted cells, migration and homing of BMSCs, immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of BMSCs, anti-fibrotic activity of BMSCs, the role of BMSCs in angiogenesis, and differentiation of BMSCs into cardiomyocyte-like cells and endothelial cells. Each aspect is complementary to the others and together they promote the repair of cardiomyocytes by BMSCs after MI. Although transplantation of BMSCs has enabled new options for MI treatment, the critical issue we must now address is the reduced viability of transplanted BMSCs due to inadequate blood supply, poor nourishment of cells, and generation of free radicals. More clinical trials are needed to prove the therapeutic potential of BMSCs in MI.
Chi et al. (2017) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells was evaluated. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells show therapeutic potential for myocardial infarction via differentiation and angiogenesis, though poor viability of transplanted cells remains a challenge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: