Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different nutritional strategies on the intensification of beef cattle farming on pastures during the dry period of the year. Eighty male cattle (testers) were randomly allocated to 16 paddocks formed with Mombaça grass (Megathyrsus maximus), totaling five animals (testers) per paddock. The strategies consisted of two LCs 10 and 16.7 g·kg−1 body weight (BW) and two PSs with DDGS and SBM in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The chemical, structural, and productive characteristics of the forage were evaluated, as well as the performance, productivity, and serum parameters of the supplemented animals. The forage presented a greater L:C (p = 0.033) and CP content (p = 0.007) when the lowest LC was used. Animals that received the highest LC had the highest supplement intake (p < 0.001) and the lowest pasture intake (p < 0.001). The nutritional strategy with an LC of 16.7 g·kg−1 of body weight (BW) resulted in a greater increase in total BW, i.e., 200 kg·BW ha−1 more. Therefore, higher levels of concentrate ensure greater productivity for beef cattle grazing, and DDGS can replace SBM in supplements used in the intensive raising of beef cattle on pasture without compromising the performance and productivity of the animals.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Artur Faria
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Dheyme Cristina Bolson
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
Douglas dos Santos Pina
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Animals
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Faria et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64b3cb6db6435875dc37c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121787
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: