AbstractBackground Prolonged length of stay (LOS) after elective spine surgery is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital complications and higher healthcare costs. This ambispective cohort study investigates the association between poor postoperative pain control and prolonged LOS, while adjusting for known risk factors and perioperative adverse events. Methods Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery were enrolled. The primary outcome was prolonged LOS (≥75th percentile; ≥6 days). The primary independent variable was poor pain control on postoperative day 1 (POD1; mean numeric rating scale >4 in the first 24-hours after surgery). Baseline demographics, surgical characteristics, and perioperative adverse events were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses with multiple imputation were performed to investigate the relationship between poor pain control and prolonged LOS. Results In 1078 patients, the mean LOS was 4.8 days, and 57% of patients experienced poor pain control. Multivariable analyses revealed poor pain control was independently associated with prolonged LOS (OR 1.83 95% CI=1.16-2.89, p=0.009), after adjusting for age (p=0.27), female sex (p=0.002), perioperative blood transfusion (p=0.030), postoperative airway/breathing/circulation adverse events (pConclusion Poor POD1 pain control was independently associated with prolonged LOS. Improved postoperative pain experience may lead to reduced LOS after elective spine surgery. Classifications Complications, epidemiology, cervical degenerative non-deformity, lumbar degenerative non-deformity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rena Far
University of Calgary
Jay Riva-Cambrin
University of Calgary
Steven Casha
Allen Institute for Brain Science
North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)
University of Calgary
O'Brien Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Far et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bcfe15783ba022b6fbcd7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100907