We investigated the processing of resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. We asked whether resumptive pronouns in complex relative clauses formed from islands and non-islands establish dependencies with head nouns in incremental processing. Based on the findings from two reading time experiments using the Maze task with the gender-mismatch paradigm, as well as an off-line comprehension study, we conclude that (i) a dependency is formed with the head noun immediately upon encountering the resumptive pronoun; (ii) dependency formation is easier across islands than across non-islands; (iii) dependency formation privileges the head noun over intervening noun phrases; and (iv) these dependencies are maintained in off-line comprehension. The data suggest that although resumptive pronouns are judged to be unacceptable in English, comprehenders automatically and immediately integrate them using routines similar to filler-gap dependencies. We discuss the implications of our findings for the question of whether resumptive pronouns facilitate filler dependency formation in comparison to gaps, a possible reason why dependencies would be easier to establish across islands than across non-islands, and how the use of resumptive pronouns may benefit listeners as well as speakers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chung-hye Han
Trevor Block
The University of Melbourne
Holly Gendron
Simon Fraser University
Glossa Psycholinguistics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a001ff2c8f74e3340f9b1fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011.52828