Triflusal failed to show superior efficacy over aspirin for preventing vascular events after stroke (13.1% vs 12.4%; HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.85-1.38), but significantly reduced hemorrhagic complications.
RCT (n=2,113)
Double-blind
Yes
Stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=2,113)
Triflusal vs Aspirin (325 mg/d) (600 mg/d)
Incidence of nonfatal ischemic stroke, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or vascular death — HR 1.09 (0.85-1.38)
Effect estimate: HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.85-1.38)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.1% vs 12.4%
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The efficacy of the antiplatelet agent triflusal for prevention of vascular events after stroke has been reported in a pilot study. However, there is a need to confirm those results in a larger study. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study to test the efficacy of triflusal (600 mg/d) versus aspirin (325 mg/d) for prevention of vascular events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (Triflusal versus Aspirin in Cerebral Infarction Prevention TACIP). We assessed a combined end point (incidence of nonfatal ischemic stroke, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or vascular death) as well as the incidence of these events separately and the incidence of major hemorrhage. RESULTS: Of 2113 patients, 1058 received triflusal and 1055 aspirin. The mean follow-up period was 30.1 months. The incidence of combined end point (13.1% for triflusal, 12.4% for aspirin) as well the survival analysis (hazard ratio HR for triflusal versus aspirin, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.38) showed no differences between groups. The incidence of nonfatal stroke (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.44), nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.98,) and vascular death (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.96) was also similar. A significantly higher incidence of major hemorrhages in the aspirin group was recorded (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.82). The overall incidence of hemorrhage was significantly lower in the triflusal group (16.7% versus 25.2%) (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.86; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to show significantly superior efficacy of triflusal over aspirin in the long-term prevention of vascular events after stroke, but triflusal was associated with a significantly lower rate of hemorrhagic complications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jordi A. Matías‐Guiu
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
José M. Ferro
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
José Álvarez‐Sabín
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Stroke
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Hospital de Santa Maria
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matías‐Guiu et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=2,113). Triflusal vs. Aspirin (325 mg/d) was evaluated on Incidence of nonfatal ischemic stroke, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or vascular death (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85-1.38). Triflusal failed to show superior efficacy over aspirin for preventing vascular events after stroke (13.1% vs 12.4%; HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.85-1.38), but significantly reduced hemorrhagic complications.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a086b34ef79633196e8b631 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000063141.24491.50