Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The purpose of the study was to test the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT; ) for explaining physical activity (PA) in a large population sample of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Study objectives: (1) test the fit of the SCT structure in the total sample, and the diabetes sub‐types; (2) determine the SCT structural invariance between the type 1 and type 2 groups; and (3) report explained variance and compare strength of association for the SCT constructs in predicting PA for both type 1 and type 2 groups. In all, 2,311 individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were assessed on their self‐efficacy, outcome expectancies, impediments, social support, goals, and physical activity at baseline and 1,717 (74.5%) completed these assessments again at 6 months. Multi‐group Structural Equation Modeling was conducted. The findings provide evidence for the utility of the SCT in the diabetes samples. The SCT fits individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes except for SCT impediments, which appear to be obstructing goal‐setting in individuals with type 2 diabetes only. Promotion of health behavior should target self‐efficacy to set goals and change behavior. Outcome expectancies and social support are also important factors for setting goals and behavior performance.
Plotnikoff et al. (Tue,) studied this question.