Widely used quality-of-life assessment tools in heart failure often lack a patient-centered perspective, potentially reducing their sensitivity and specificity for individual patients.
The modern management of chronic heart failure has led to improved life expectancy, functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQL). HRQL measures the effects of an illness or a treatment from the patient's perspective. It is now recognised that the patient's perspective is as legitimate and valid as the clinician's in monitoring health care outcomes. Although there are a number of quality-of-life measures, which can be separated into two types-generic and disease specific-many have been developed, with little or no account being taken of the patient's perspective. Because most of the widely used measures are not patient centred, they may lack sensitivity and specificity in determining those aspects of HRQL important to individual patients. This paper reviews the use of quality-of-life assessment tools in the evaluation of patients with heart failure.
Dunderdale et al. (Thu,) conducted a review in Chronic Heart Failure. Quality-of-life assessment tools was evaluated. Widely used quality-of-life assessment tools in heart failure often lack a patient-centered perspective, potentially reducing their sensitivity and specificity for individual patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: