Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Urban trees play an important role in the urban hydrological cycle. Yet little consideration has been given in the UK either to the increasing pressures that act to reduce urban tree cover or the opportunities that might be provided by land-use planning policies to increase it. Research in North America, particularly by American Forests (2007), suggests that urban tree cover may be directly equated to stormwater volumes and, therefore, to the costs of providing engineered structures for stormwater management. Tree planting policies have been justified on the financial benefits associated with their stormwater management function alone, notwithstanding the broader spectrum of benefits they provide within the urban environment. This paper presents preliminary research aimed at transferring these findings into a UK context. Two residential morphology units (RMUs) have been defined within the city of Sheffield, for which current levels of tree cover have been accurately quantified. Current tree cover levels are relatively low, but approaches to integrating more trees into these two landscape types are outlined.
Stovin et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: