Ximelagatran resulted in a 19.2% incidence of venous thromboembolism compared to 25.7% with warfarin after total knee arthroplasty (difference -6.5%; 95% CI -13.5 to 0.6; P=0.070).
RCT (n=680)
Randomized
Double-blind
Yes
680 patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty, treated for 7 to 12 days for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism.
Ximelagatran vs Warfarin (24 mg twice daily)
Venous thromboembolism (asymptomatic DVT, symptomatic DVT, or pulmonary embolism) — difference -6.5 percentage points (-13.5 to 0.6), p=0.070
Effect estimate: difference -6.5 percentage points (95% CI -13.5 to 0.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 19.2% vs 25.7%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 6.5%
p-value: p=0.070
BACKGROUND: Warfarin is used for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. However, it is associated with rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of approximately 38% to 55% and requires routine coagulation monitoring and frequent dose adjustment. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has shown promising efficacy and tolerability in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ximelagatran and warfarin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. SETTING: 74 North American hospitals. PATIENTS: 680 patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. INTERVENTION: 7 to 12 days of treatment with oral ximelagatran, 24 mg twice daily, starting on the morning after surgery, or warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.5 range, 1.8 to 3.0), starting on the evening of the day of surgery. MEASUREMENTS: Principal end points were asymptomatic DVT on mandatory venography; symptomatic DVT confirmed by ultrasonography or venography; symptomatic, objectively proven pulmonary embolism; and bleeding. All were assessed by blinded adjudication locally and at a central study laboratory. RESULTS: On central adjudication, incidence of venous thromboembolism was 19.2% (53 of 276 patients) in the ximelagatran group and 25.7% (67 of 261 patients) in the warfarin group (difference, -6.5 percentage points 95% CI, -13.5 to 0.6 percentage points; P = 0.070). On local assessment, incidence was 25.4% in the ximelagatran group and 33.5% in the warfarin group (P = 0.043). In the ximelagatran and warfarin groups, respectively, major bleeding occurred in 1.7% and 0.9% of patients and minor bleeding occurred in 7.8% and 6.4% of patients. No variables related to bleeding differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, fixed-dose ximelagatran started the morning after total knee arthroplasty is well tolerated and at least as effective as warfarin, but it does not require coagulation monitoring or dose adjustment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Charles W. Francis
Vascular Medicine
Bruce L. Davidson
Vascular / Pulmonary Vascular
Scott D. Berkowitz
Vascular Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
University of Washington
University of Pennsylvania
University of California, Los Angeles
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Francis et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty (n=680). Ximelagatran vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (asymptomatic DVT, symptomatic DVT, or pulmonary embolism) (difference -6.5 percentage points, 95% CI -13.5 to 0.6, p=0.070). Ximelagatran resulted in a 19.2% incidence of venous thromboembolism compared to 25.7% with warfarin after total knee arthroplasty (difference -6.5%; 95% CI -13.5 to 0.6; P=0.070).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2085e078c6e96e5b3e8fc6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00008