Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Aggressive random testing tools ("fuzzers") are impressively effective at finding compiler bugs. For example, a single test-case generator has resulted in more than 1,700 bugs reported for a single JavaScript engine. However, fuzzers can be frustrating to use: they indiscriminately and repeatedly find bugs that may not be severe enough to fix right away. Currently, users filter out undesirable test cases using ad hoc methods such as disallowing problematic features in tests and grepping test results. This paper formulates and addresses the fuzzer taming problem: given a potentially large number of random test cases that trigger failures, order them such that diverse, interesting test cases are highly ranked. Our evaluation shows our ability to solve the fuzzer taming problem for 3,799 test cases triggering 46 bugs in a C compiler and 2,603 test cases triggering 28 bugs in a JavaScript engine.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yang Chen
Renmin University of China
Alex Groce
Northern Arizona University
Chaoqiang Zhang
Taiho Pharmaceutical (Japan)
University of Utah
Oregon State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1572a1814bf8ec9a4e9ae6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2491956.2462173