Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The concept of clinical supervision as a means of professional learning and support is well known within some health and social care professions, but there is a dearth of literature related to clinical supervision and physiotherapy. The aim of this article was to report the findings of an exploratory study of clinical supervision in physiotherapy. A mixed methodological approach was adopted, through the use of self‐administered questionnaires supplemented by a small number of interviews. The findings suggest that clinical supervision is not widespread and where it has been implemented it is difficult to sustain. Different structural models were adopted in different locations. The data revealed that support for continuing professional development was a highly rated purpose for clinical supervision. Respondents used supervision for different purposes at different times depending on their individual needs, suggesting that no single model is suitable for all occasions. Any model adopted must be flexible enough to suit the needs of both the individual and the organization. Proctor's identification of the normative, formative and restorative functions of clinical supervision appears to fit current aspirations and practices very well. Support and enthusiasm for clinical supervision was high. Respondents expressed a need to take time for supervision and also valued the time it gave them; but heavy workloads, busy schedules and staff shortages frequently meant that supervision was not seen as a priority.
Julie Sellars (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: