Clopidogrel reduced the annual risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared to aspirin (5.33% vs 5.83%; RRR 8.7%, 95% CI 0.3-16.5, p=0.043).
RCT (n=19,185)
blinded
randomized
Yes
Does clopidogrel reduce the composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared to aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events?
Clopidogrel is slightly more effective than aspirin in reducing the risk of ischemic events in at-risk patients, with a different adverse effect profile.
Effect estimate: RRR 8.7% (95% CI 0.3-16.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.33% vs 5.83%
p-value: p=0.043
Ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and peripheral arterial disease are different clinical manifestations commonly due to the same underlying disease, i.e. atherosclerosis with subsequent thrombosis/embolism (atherothrombosis). Many clinical trials of secondary prevention after stroke or TIA have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of subsequent vascular events. Aspirin and triclopidine have been shown to be effective in placebo-controlled studies for the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Contrasting with these benefits, there were potentially serious, though rare, adverse effects. These considerations certainly justify the development of new antiplatelet agents. Clopidogrel is a new ADP-receptor antagonist, with a greater activity in animal models of thrombosis. CAPRIE (Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) was a randomized, blinded, international trial designed to assess the relative efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin in reducing the risk of the outcome cluster of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death, as well as to assess their relative safety. 19,185 patients were recruited. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that the relative risk reduction was 8.7% (95% CI 0.3-16.5, p = 0.043) in favor of clopidogrel from an overall annual event rate of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death, ranging from 5.83% in the aspirin group to 5.33% in the clopidogrel group. The percentage of adverse events reported was higher in the aspirin group for all categories except rash, diarrhea, and abnormal liver function. It seems likely that clopidogrel will replace ticlopidine for stroke prevention, because of its better safety profile, and comparable efficacy. Clopidogrel probably will not replace aspirin as the first line therapy for many clinicians because of its higher cost and lack of widespread experience. However, other clinicians have already decided that they will use clopidogrel as first choice, because of the significant advantage over aspirin demonstrated in the CAPRIE study.
Paciaroni et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Patients at risk of ischemic events (n=19,185). Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin was evaluated on outcome cluster of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death (RRR 8.7%, 95% CI 0.3-16.5, p=0.043). Clopidogrel reduced the annual risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared to aspirin (5.33% vs 5.83%; RRR 8.7%, 95% CI 0.3-16.5, p=0.043).