Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Most longitudinal studies are plagued by drop-out related to variables at earlier assessments (systematic attrition). Although systematic attrition is often analysed in longitudinal studies, surprisingly few researchers attempt to reduce biases due to systematic attrition, even though this is possible and nowadays technically easy. This is particularly true for studies of stability and the long-term prediction of developmental outcomes. We provide guidelines how to reduce biases in such cases particularly with multiple imputation. Following these guidelines does not require advanced statistical knowledge or special software. We illustrate these guidelines and the importance of reducing biases due to selective attrition with a 25-year longitudinal study on the long-term prediction of aggressiveness and delinquency.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jens B. Asendorpf
Rens van de Schoot
Jaap J. A. Denissen
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Utrecht University
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Tilburg University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Asendorpf et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8c4842c39562886ae29f7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414542713