Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In ecology and conservation biology, the number of species counted in a biodiversity study is a key metric but is usually a biased underestimate of total species richness because many rare species are not detected. Moreover, comparing species richness among sites or samples is a statistical challenge because the observed number of species is sensitive to the number of individuals counted or the area sampled. For individual-based data, we treat a single, empirical sample of species abundances from an investigator-defined species assemblage or community as a reference point for two estimation objectives under two sampling models: estimating the expected number of species (and its unconditional variance) in a random sample of (i) a smaller number of individuals (multinomial model) or a smaller area sampled (Poisson model) and (ii) a larger number of individuals or a larger area sampled. For sample-based incidence (presence-absence) data, under a Bernoulli product model, we treat a single set of species incidence frequencies as the reference point to estimate richness for smaller and larger numbers of sampling units.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert K. Colwell
Anne Chao
N. J. Gotelli
Journal of Plant Ecology
University of Utah
University of Connecticut
University of Vermont
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Colwell et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d73e6e3f2a6ac123b8ae37 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr044