Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The effect of training instruction, whether presented as the manufacturer's printed instructions, a short video training session specific to the product, or as a one-on-one training session was evaluated using four hearing protection devices with eight groups of subjects. Naïve subjects were recruited and tested using three different forms of training: written, video, and individual training. The group averages for A-weighted attenuation were not statistically significant when compared between the video or the written instruction conditions, regardless of presentation order. The experimenter-trained A-weighted attenuations were significantly greater than the written and video instruction for most of the protectors and groups. For each earplug, the noise reduction statistic for A-weighting (NRS A ) and the associated confidence intervals were calculated for the 80 th and 20 th percentiles of protection. Across subject groups for each protector, the differences between NRS A ratings were found to be not statistically significant. Several comparisons evaluating the order of testing, the type of testing, and statistical tests of the performance across the groups are presented.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
WilliamJ Murphy
MarkR Stephenson
DavidC Byrne
Noise and Health
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Murphy et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4f675ea84e55561013fb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.77215
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: