Does the absence of delayed hyperenhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI better predict improvement of regional myocardial function compared to the absence of early hypoenhancement in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Patients after acute myocardial infarction
Contrast-enhanced MRI assessing delayed hyperenhancement
Contrast-enhanced MRI assessing early hypoenhancement
Improvement of regional contractility (resting circumferential shortening strain [Ecc])surrogate
The absence of delayed hyperenhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI is a significantly more accurate predictor of regional myocardial functional recovery after acute MI than the absence of early hypoenhancement.
Background— Contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI demonstrates a pattern of hypoenhancement early after contrast injection in acute myocardial infarction (MI) and a pattern of hyperenhancement late after contrast injection. Because the significance of these CE patterns for myocardial viability remains debated, we evaluated their diagnostic accuracy to quantitatively predict late functional improvement of regional contractility. Methods and Results— Twenty patients underwent CE and tagged MRI at 4 days and again at 7 months after acute MI. Resting circumferential shortening strain (Ecc) was analyzed in 24 segments per patient, and its improvement was correlated with the presence or absence of the CE patterns. Immediately after MI, 389 segments were considered dysfunctional because of having less than mean±2 SD Ecc of the remote region (−18±4%). At follow-up, significant improvement of Ecc occurred in 170 dysfunctional segments with normal CE (from −4±7% to −12±7%, P <0.001) but not in 60 segments with early hypoenhancement (from −2±6% to −6±9% Ecc, P =NS). In 240 dysfunctional segments with delayed hyperenhancement, the improvement of Ecc (from −2±6% to −5±8%, P <0.001) decreased with increasing transmural extent of hyperenhancement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that absence of delayed hyperenhancement, compared with absence of early hypoenhancement, had better sensitivity (82% versus 19%, respectively; P <0.001) and accuracy (74% versus 49%, respectively; P <0.001) in predicting recovery of Ecc to any given level. Conclusions— Compared with lack of early hypoenhancement, lack of delayed hyperenhancement has better diagnostic accuracy in predicting functional improvement in dysfunctional segments. The early hypoenhanced regions, which represent only the fraction of infarcted tissue with concomitant microvascular obstruction, greatly underestimate the amount of irreversibly injured myocardium present after acute MI.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bernhard Gerber
Cardiac Imaging
Jérôme Garot
Cardiac Imaging
David A. Bluemke
Cardiac Imaging
Circulation
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gerber et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf4143f98eeeb5870333bc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000027818.15792.1e