Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article addresses three controversial issues related to mixed methods research and policy. First, “Scientific-Based Research” promoted by “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) reinforces diametrically opposed paradigmatic views and research methodologies. As policy, NCLB prioritizes specific methodologies prescribing what counts as scientific evidence. Second, from a critical stance, federal policies shape and control decisions that funding agencies make regarding methodologies (Randomized Controlled Trials—Gold Standard). Third, top-down policies are currently framed in postpositivist ontological and epistemological conceptions and should include constructivist, critical, transformative, and emancipatory paradigms supporting alternative methodologies. This article challenges current practices of prioritizing specific research methodologies used to evaluate interventions. As an alternative, logical purpose statements and research questions should be the standard used to guide decisions about appropriate methodologies and procedures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas Christ
Qualitative Inquiry
University of Bridgeport
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas Christ (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f244b5d1bfa3da41994b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413508523
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: