Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
). This cluster-randomized trial included 204 communities (n = 1,113 children in final sample), stratified by community indigenous status, and assigned to receive either: (T0) CCT only; (T1) CCT plus availability of EI in the community; or (T2) T1 plus promotion of the EI program by the CCT program. Interviews were conducted with the mother or primary caregiver of each child at baseline (2008, children 0-18 months old), and at follow-up (2012, children 3-5 years old); the intervention began after baseline and continued for all eligible households. Cognitive development was assessed with the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (baseline) and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Development (follow-up); assessors were blinded to treatment. All analyses were intention to treat. There were significant effects on child development when EI received support and promotion from the CCT program (T₂ vs. T₀: General Cognitive Index, β = 3.90; 95% CI 0.51, 7.30, Verbal Score, β = 4.28; 95% CI 0.51, 8.05, and Memory Score, β = 4.14; 95% CI 0.62, 7.66), effects equivalent to 0.26-0.29 SD. There were no significant benefits when the programs operated independently (T₁ vs. T₀). In stratified analyses, EI showed significant effects in indigenous communities only. We found consistent results in regressions controlling for covariates, with some reductions in magnitude of differences. Our findings suggest that group-based, parenting support programs can improve child outcomes within the context of a CCT, but only when the 2 programs are integrated and mutually supportive. (PsycINFO Database Record
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lia C. H. Fernald
Berkeley Public Health Division
Rose M. C. Kagawa
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Heather A. Knauer
University of Michigan
Developmental Psychology
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
Instituto Nacional de Perinatología
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fernald et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17b29d3aabde875b12d652 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000185