Does biochemical screening for nonadherence and subsequent patient discussion improve adherence and reduce blood pressure in nonadherent hypertensive patients?
Hypertensive patients attending specialist tertiary care centers (n=331 total; 238 UK patients of which 73 were nonadherent, and 93 nonadherent Czech patients).
Screening for nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based biochemical analysis of urine or serum, followed by discussion of the results with the patient.
Change in clinic blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and adherence ratio (ratio of detected to prescribed antihypertensive medications).surrogate
Biochemical screening for antihypertensive nonadherence using LC-MS/MS, combined with patient discussion, significantly improves medication adherence and lowers blood pressure.
We hypothesized that screening for nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based biochemical analysis of urine/serum has therapeutic applications in nonadherent hypertensive patients. A retrospective analysis of hypertensive patients attending specialist tertiary care centers was conducted in 2 European countries (United Kingdom and Czech Republic). Nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment was diagnosed using biochemical analysis of urine (United Kingdom) or serum (Czech Republic). These results were subsequently discussed with each patient, and data on follow-up clinic blood pressure (BP) measurements were collected from clinical files. Of 238 UK patients who underwent biochemical urine analysis, 73 were nonadherent to antihypertensive treatment. Their initial urinary adherence ratio (the ratio of detected to prescribed antihypertensive medications) increased from 0.33 (0-0.67) to 1 (0.67-1) between the first and the last clinic appointments. The observed increase in the urinary adherence ratio in initially nonadherent UK patients was associated with the improved BP control; by the last clinic appointment, systolic and diastolic BPs were ≈19.5 and 7.5 mm Hg lower than at baseline (P=0.001 and 0.009, respectively). These findings were further corroborated in 93 nonadherent hypertensive patients from Czech Republic-their average systolic and diastolic BPs dropped by ≈32.6 and 17.4 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.001), on appointments after the biochemical analysis. Our data show that nonadherent hypertensive patients respond to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based biochemical analysis with improved adherence and significant BP drop. Such repeated biochemical analyses should be considered as a therapeutic approach in nonadherent hypertensive patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pankaj Gupta
Preventive Cardiology
Prashanth Patel
Preventive Cardiology
Branislav Štrauch
General / Preventive / Lipids
Hypertension
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gupta et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56f8d75589c71d767d9ac — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.09631
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: