What question did this study set out to answer?

This evaluation aims to assess the participation and submissions in the COLIEE 2017 competition focused on legal question answering.

January 23, 2018Open Access

Overview of COLIEE 2017

YKYoshinobu KanoShizuoka University MKMi-Young KimUniversity of Alberta RGRandy GoebelTuring Institute

Key Points

This evaluation aims to assess the participation and submissions in the COLIEE 2017 competition focused on legal question answering.
The competition featured two sub-tasks: legal information retrieval and recognizing entailment.
Participation was open to any group using any approach, with 10 teams registered.
Submissions included 9 for Task 1 (17 runs) and 8 for Task 2 (20 runs).
The competition attracted diverse participation with 10 teams involved.
A total of 9 submissions and 17 runs were completed for legal information retrieval.
Task 2 included 8 submissions resulting in 20 runs focusing on entailment.

Abstract

We present the evaluation of the legal question answering Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment (COLIEE) 2017. The COLIEE 2017 Task consists of two sub-Tasks: legal information retrieval (Task 1), and recognizing entailment between articles and queries (Task 2). Participation was open to any group based on any approach, and the tasks attracted 10 teams. We received 9 submissions to Task 1 (for a total of 17 runs), and 8 submissions to Task 2 (for a total of 20 runs).

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kano et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd6351567d2fc4d5f1bfa https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29007/fm8f

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper