October 2, 2017

Cognitive Interviewing for Item Development: Validity Evidence Based on Content and Response Processes

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Cognitive interviewing (CI) is a method to identify sources of confusion in assessment items and to assess validity evidence on the basis of content and response processes. We introduce readers to CI and describe a process for conducting such interviews and analyzing the results. Recommendations for best practice are provided.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Peterson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dacc4aaae38ff6ad836b43 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564

Authors

Christina Hamme Peterson

N. Andrew Peterson

Kristen Gilmore Powell

Journals

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Actions

Institutions

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Rider University

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Comparing results from different styles of cognitive interviewing: ‘verbal probing’ vs. ‘thinking aloud’· 2010 · 84 citations
Sample Size for Cognitive Interview Pretesting· 2011 · 138 citations
Protocol Analysis· 2017 · 46 citations
Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questions· 2004 · 536 citations
Cognitive Interviewing· 2005 · 1,658 citations

Cognitive Interviewing for Item Development: Validity Evidence Based on Content and Response Processes

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Also consider