Switching from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients significantly improved LVEF (29.6% vs 34.8%; P<0.001) and reduced left ventricular volumes.
Cohort (n=125)
Single-blind
No
Absolute Event Rate: 34.8% vs 29.6%
p-value: p=< .001
BACKGROUND: Major classes of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) induce reverse remodeling. The revere remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan remains unstudied. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective assessor-blinded study to determine the reverse remodeling response of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in HFrEF patients with a class I indication (New York heart Association NYHA-class II-IV, Left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF < 35%, optimal dose with Renin-Angiotensin-System-Blocker RAS-blocker). Doses of sacubitril/valsartan were optimized to individual tolerance. Echocardiographic images were assessed offline by 2 investigators blinded to both the clinical data and timing of echocardiograms. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty-five HFrEF patients (66 ± 10 years) were prospectively included. The amount of RAS-blocker before and after switch to sacubitril/valsartan was similar(P = .290), indicating individual optimal dosing of sacubitril/valsartan. Over a median(IQR) follow-up of 118(77-160) days after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, LVEF improved (29.6 ± 6% vs 34.8 ± 6%; P < .001) and Left ventricular end-systolic (LVESV) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) decreased (LVESV; 147 ± 57 mL vs 129 ± 55 mL; P < .001 and LVEDV; 206 ± 71 mL vs197 ± 72 mL; P = .027). Volumetric remodeling was associated with a reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation (1.59 ± 1.0 vs 1.11 ± 0.8; P < .001; scale from 0-4). Metrics of diastolic function improved; including a drop in the E/A-wave ratio (1.75 ± 1.13 vs 1.38 ± 0.88; P = .002) and diastolic filling time (% of cycle length) prolonged (48 ± 9% vs 52 ± 1%; P = .005). The percent of patients with a restrictive mitral filling pattern dropped from 47% to 23% (P = .004). A dose-dependent effect was noted for changes in LVEF (P < .001) and LVESV (P = .031), with higher doses of sacubitril/valsartan leading to more reverse remodeling. CONCLUSION: Switching therapy in eligible HFrEF patients from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan induces beneficial reverse remodeling of both metrics of systolic as diastolic function.
Martens et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=125). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. RAS-blocker (baseline) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=< .001). Switching from a RAS-blocker to sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients significantly improved LVEF (29.6% vs 34.8%; P<0.001) and reduced left ventricular volumes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: